Full report · 6.5 kWp · Cavite, PH · Dec 2025 – Sep 2026
Residential solar performance — full analysis
Detailed monthly generation, self-sufficiency, ROI, battery health, and grid feed-in figures for a 6.5 kWp / 14.3 kWh / 8 kW system.
Full report · 6.5 kWp · Cavite, PH · Dec 2025 – Sep 2026
Detailed monthly generation, self-sufficiency, ROI, battery health, and grid feed-in figures for a 6.5 kWp / 14.3 kWh / 8 kW system.
Based on analysis of solar data from December 2025 – September 2026 (303 days).
September recovered most of August's lost generation: the array averaged ~21.7 kWh/day, up ~38% on the monsoon month, and self-sufficiency rose ~7 points to 58.4%**. The month's saving came to **₱10,765 at ₱16.71/kWh. Load rose faster than the recovery, though: consumption climbed ~25% to ~36.8 kWh/day on eight charging days (against August's three) and a heavier overnight draw, so the battery bottomed at its 10–11% floor on every day of the month and never filled. Export was zero for the whole month.
The three low-generation flags in September (Sep 4, 5 and 7) are the tail of the August flooding event, not equipment. The battery is healthy: raw round-trip efficiency was 96.7%, and the start and end of the month sat close enough in state of charge that no correction is needed.
The system remains on a ~3.0-year payback on ₱400,000 (~2.2 years remaining), cutting the annual bill ~66%. The overnight load floor is still the largest addressable saving and it grew this month, to ~890 W from ~734 W in August. Charging sessions that start at 06:00, before the array produces anything, are the second item.
The system avoids ~5.2 tonnes of CO₂ a year.
Three September days generated less than 60% of their rolling baseline, all in the first week, when data/month_notes.md records that the August flooding had not yet subsided across parts of Luzon.
| Date | Daily PV (kWh) | Expected (kWh) | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-07 | 5.3 | ~18.4 | −71% |
| 2026-09-05 | 8.6 | ~20.4 | −58% |
| 2026-09-04 | 10.9 | ~21.5 | −49% |
No action is indicated. Each of the three days shows output suppressed across the whole daylight window (Sep 7 never exceeded ~1.0 kWh in any hour) rather than cutting off, and they sit in one run between Sep 4 and Sep 8. The array produced ~30.3 kWh on 1 September and ~30.0 kWh on the 13th and 21st. A degraded or partly shaded array cannot reach those figures.
Both are small-throughput days where a partial cycle makes the daily ratio unreliable, and the month-level efficiency (96.7%) is normal. September is the first month with two flags, bringing the total to five in 303 days (2026-03-17, 2026-05-17, 2026-08-01, 2026-09-15, 2026-09-23). None has recurred on the same conditions, so this is not a pattern yet. If three or more appear in October, it would warrant a look at the BMS logs.
The household drew ~890 W through the small hours of September (01:00–05:00), up from ~734 W in August and above the ~785 W dataset average. That floor runs every night regardless of weather, and it is the only significant load that neither the panels nor the battery can offset by retiming. In September the battery reached its 10–11% floor every single day, so the overnight draw came almost entirely from the grid: ~5.3 kWh of import per night between midnight and 06:00.
The 01:00–05:00 floor alone was ~4.5 kWh per night, ~134 kWh across the month, or ~₱2,230. Annualised, every 100 W removed is 2.4 kWh/day and **₱14,600/year** at ₱16.71/kWh. Removing 300 W — roughly the gap between September and the quieter months — is ~₱43,900/year, which would bring the remaining payback from ~2.2 years to ~1.6.
The floor is not fixed. It sat at ~660–740 W from December to March, jumped to ~1,020 W in April and ~830 W in May, eased to ~730–800 W through the wet season, and is now back up at ~890 W. That shape tracks the hot months, which points to cooling running overnight, but the September rise came without April's heat, so something else may have been added. Identifying it needs measurement: a plug-in power meter moved around the house over a week, or a clamp meter on individual circuits. Start with air conditioners and anything that runs a compressor or a motor, then anything with a permanently lit LED.
Charging days now average ~49.2 kWh of load against ~25.0 kWh of generation, and the battery reaches evening at ~22% SOC against ~45% on ordinary days. The average peak grid draw on charging days is ~5.8 kW against ~1.8 kW otherwise.
September's eight charging days show the timing problem clearly. The largest extra draw landed at 06:00–07:00 (~2.5–2.6 kW above an ordinary day), when the array is producing ~0.2–0.9 kW and the battery is at its floor, so those hours are pure grid import. A second block ran 13:00–17:00, and smaller draws continued at 19:00–21:00. Moving the morning start to ~09:00 and finishing by ~14:00 puts the session against the peak generation window.
The financial gain is modest. With the feed-in credit at ~58% of import, moving a kWh from grid import to self-consumption is worth ~₱7.06, and on charging days the array rarely has surplus to give. The larger benefit is keeping the battery from being drained before the evening peak. Set the EVSE or in-cabin scheduler to start ~09:00 and stop by ~14:00.
On September charging days the array made ~24.4 kWh against ~50.9 kWh of load; on ordinary September days, ~20.7 kWh against ~31.7 kWh. The battery peaked at 96% (Sep 1) and never reached full, so there was no surplus to export or store. A larger battery would have had nothing more to charge with. Avoidable import — the ceiling on what better battery scheduling could recover — is ~1.2 kWh/day, ~₱7,300/year, and that is an upper bound.
The inverter has room for more generation: peak output has never exceeded 5.44 kW against an 8 kW AC rating (68%), with zero clipping hours in 303 days and a DC/AC ratio of 0.81. Roughly 3–4 kWp could be added before the inverter becomes the limit. No roof expansion is assumed here, so nothing is modelled.
| Month | Rate (₱/kWh) | Without Solar | With Solar | Feed-in Credit | Net Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 14.41 | ₱13,424 | ₱6,133 | ₱0 | ₱7,291 |
| Jan 2026 | 14.13 | ₱11,736 | ₱4,697 | ₱0 | ₱7,039 |
| Feb 2026 | 13.80 | ₱10,609 | ₱2,871 | ₱682 | ₱8,420 |
| Mar 2026 | 14.14 | ₱12,464 | ₱2,928 | ₱983 | ₱10,520 |
| Apr 2026 | 14.98 | ₱17,542 | ₱5,585 | ₱208 | ₱12,165 |
| May 2026 | 15.50 | ₱18,633 | ₱5,599 | ₱128 | ₱13,162 |
| Jun 2026 | 16.10 | ₱18,539 | ₱7,443 | ₱47 | ₱11,144 |
| Jul 2026 | 16.00 | ₱18,001 | ₱6,038 | ₱166 | ₱12,129 |
| Aug 2026 | 16.75 | ₱15,302 | ₱7,371 | ₱217 | ₱8,148 |
| Sep 2026 | 16.71 | ₱18,439 | ₱7,674 | ₱0 | ₱10,765 |
Each month is billed at the rate in effect that month. September's ₱10,765 is ~₱2,600 above August's, driven by the generation recovery. The grid bill itself rose to ₱7,674, the highest in the dataset, because load grew to ~1,104 kWh, up ~190 kWh on August, and the battery emptied every night. The feed-in credit rose to ₱9.65/kWh but earned nothing, since nothing was exported.
The annual figures are projected at today's ₱16.71/₱9.65 tariff.
| Metric | With Battery | Without Battery |
|---|---|---|
| System cost | ₱400,000 | ₱300,000 |
| Estimated annual savings (year 1) | ₱133,106 | ₱116,112 |
| Simple payback | 3.0 years | 2.6 years |
| Remaining payback | 2.2 years | 1.7 years |
| 25-year lifetime savings | ₱3,135,438 | ₱2,735,129 |
Battery incremental ROI: the battery (~₱100,000 of the total) adds ~₱17,000/year over the panels-only case by shifting ~8.1 kWh/day of discharge from export at ₱9.65 to self-consumption displacing ₱16.71 import. Standalone battery payback is ~5.9 years against a ~28-year projected cycle life.
That is longer than last month's ~5.4 years. Throughput recovered in September (~217 kWh charged against August's ~141 kWh), so the lengthening comes from the tariff: the feed-in credit rose to ₱9.65 while the import rate eased to ₱16.71, narrowing the import/export spread from ₱7.52 to ₱7.06/kWh. A better-paid export makes each stored kWh worth less. The panels carry most of the return either way, and the battery remains justified over its life.
Payback is measured against a 25+ year panel lifespan. The ₱400,000 is the total invested figure including financing cost; hardware-only cost would yield a shorter payback.
| Metric | Non-EV Days | EV Days |
|---|---|---|
| Daily PV generation | ~22.1 kWh | ~25.0 kWh |
| Daily consumption | ~30.3 kWh | ~49.2 kWh |
| Daily grid import | ~9.8 kWh | ~24.3 kWh |
| Daily grid export | ~1.2 kWh | ~0.3 kWh |
| Evening SOC | ~45% | ~22% |
Weekday and weekend consumption are similar (~30.1 vs ~31.0 kWh/day, 67% vs 70% self-sufficiency). Weekend load runs 220–330 W higher from 10:00 to 15:00, when occupants are home and generation is at its peak, so load-shifting is more practical at weekends; weekday gains need timer-based automation instead.
No roof expansion is assumed in this report.
The system is well-sized for how the household uses it. Storage has never been the limiting factor and the inverter has never come close. The ten-month record shows import driven by two things only load and generation address: the overnight floor, and charging days that consume twice what the array produces. Optimization lies in the overnight load floor first, charge timing second, and added capacity third if roof area appears.
Raw monthly round-trip efficiency is distorted whenever a month starts and ends at very different states of charge, because energy charged in one month is discharged in the next. Adjusting for that carry-over using the ~14.1 kWh usable estimate:
| Month | Raw | SOC start → end | Carry-over | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 98.3% | 23% → 20% | −0.5 kWh | 98.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 96.7% | 17% → 46% | +4.1 kWh | 98.3% |
| Feb 2026 | 96.3% | 42% → 22% | −2.8 kWh | 95.3% |
| Mar 2026 | 94.5% | 22% → 53% | +4.4 kWh | 95.8% |
| Apr 2026 | 98.0% | 22% → 21% | −0.1 kWh | 97.9% |
| May 2026 | 97.4% | 21% → 11% | −1.4 kWh | 96.9% |
| Jun 2026 | 96.2% | 11% → 11% | ±0.0 kWh | 96.2% |
| Jul 2026 | 91.9% | 11% → 92% | +11.4 kWh | 95.8% |
| Aug 2026 | 105.8% | 91% → 24% | −9.4 kWh | 99.2% |
| Sep 2026 | 96.7% | 16% → 12% | −0.6 kWh | 96.5% |
September started and ended near the SOC floor, so its raw figure needs almost no correction. The low reading that last month's report anticipated did not appear, because the battery had already discharged from ~24% to ~16% before midnight on 31 August. Across ten months the adjusted range is 95.3%–99.2% with no downward trend — healthy for LFP, which is typically rated 92–95%.
| Metric | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg daily PV | ~15.8 kWh | ~21.7 kWh | +38% |
| Avg daily load | ~29.5 kWh | ~36.8 kWh | +25% |
| Self-sufficiency | 51.8% | 58.4% | +7pp |
| Grid dependence | 48% | 42% | −7pp |
| Battery efficiency (adjusted) | 99.2% | 96.5% | −2.7pp |
The generation rise is weather clearing. The load rise has two parts: five more charging days (each adds ~19 kWh over an ordinary day, ~95 kWh in total), and ordinary-day load rising from ~27.6 to ~31.7 kWh, of which the overnight floor accounts for ~0.8 kWh. Together they absorbed most of the recovered generation, which is why self-sufficiency recovered only 7 of August's 15 lost points.
Across ten months, self-sufficiency has run from a December floor of 54.3% to a March peak of 76.5%, then declined through the wet season to 59.9% (June), recovered to 66.5% (July), fell to the dataset low of 51.8% (August), and is now at 58.4%.
August was an exceptional weather event — the monsoon produced widespread flooding across Luzon, with waters still not subsided in parts of the island into early September. It should not be treated as a normal August or folded into a revised wet-season factor.
Excluding it raises the de-seasonalized baseline from ~22.4 to ~23.0 kWh/day, lifting projected annual generation from ~8,190 to ~8,410 kWh, ~3%. August does not dominate the average because December and January are independently weak.
The assumed tropical seasonal factors do not match this site. Comparing each month's observed output against the ten-month mean:
| Month | Observed factor | Assumed factor |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
| Jan 2026 | 0.74 | 1.07 |
| Feb 2026 | 1.05 | 1.07 |
| Mar 2026 | 1.21 | 1.07 |
| Apr 2026 | 1.22 | 1.07 |
| May 2026 | 1.23 | 1.07 |
| Jun 2026 | 1.04 | 0.93 |
| Jul 2026 | 1.13 | 0.93 |
| Aug 2026 | 0.70 | 0.93 |
| Sep 2026 | 0.96 | 0.93 |
September is the first wet-season month to land close to its assumed factor, even with the depressed first week. The real shape is a strong March–May peak (~1.21–1.23 against an assumed 1.07) and a weak December–January trough (~0.73–0.74 against an assumed 1.00–1.07). The model has the amihan months roughly 35% too high. July (1.13) remains one of the stronger months, so a blanket July–October downgrade would be wrong.
Correcting this needs a second year of data, since each factor is currently a single observation. Until then the projection stands as computed, with the caveat that its month-to-month distribution is less reliable than its annual total.
total_load - grid_import, which measures actual solar offset and avoids inflating by battery round-trip losses.max(8, avg_daily_load × 0.3)).analyze.py.analyze.py, which does not model it: direct self-consumption (min(pv, load) in generating hours) is valued at the import rate, and export plus battery discharge at the feed-in rate.Best day: 2026-03-19 — PV: 30.0 kWh, Load: 25.5 kWh, Import: 1.4 kWh, Export: 6.4 kWh. Ordinary day. Peak dry-season generation against a modest load, with the battery reaching 100% and carrying the evening almost unaided. Self-sufficiency: 95%.
Worst day: 2026-08-29 — PV: 1.4 kWh, Load: 21.4 kWh, Import: 20.0 kWh, Export: 0 kWh. Ordinary day. The deepest point of the August monsoon; the array produced almost nothing, the battery never rose above 23% SOC, and effectively the entire day ran on grid import. Self-sufficiency: 6%.
| Month | Avg Daily kWh | Peak Sun Hours | Capacity Factor | Grid Dependence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | 16.5 | 2.5 | 10.5% | 46% |
| Jan 2026 | 16.7 | 2.6 | 10.7% | 40% |
| Feb 2026 | 23.6 | 3.6 | 15.1% | 27% |
| Mar 2026 | 27.2 | 4.2 | 17.4% | 23% |
| Apr 2026 | 27.6 | 4.3 | 17.7% | 32% |
| May 2026 | 27.8 | 4.3 | 17.8% | 30% |
| Jun 2026 | 23.4 | 3.6 | 15.0% | 40% |
| Jul 2026 | 25.4 | 3.9 | 16.3% | 34% |
| Aug 2026 | 15.8 | 2.4 | 10.1% | 48% |
| Sep 2026 | 21.7 | 3.3 | 13.9% | 42% |
data/month_notes.md as they happenThis report was generated by an AI model. While the numerical computations are performed by a deterministic script (analyze.py), the narrative interpretation, recommendations, and contextual inferences (seasonal factors, grid emission factors, sizing assessments) are AI-generated and may contain inaccuracies. The without-battery ROI, the SOC-adjusted battery efficiency and the overnight floor figures are computed outside that script and carry the extra assumptions noted in the methodology. Verify critical findings — especially financial estimates and equipment diagnostics — against your own records, manufacturer specifications, or a qualified solar professional before making decisions based on this report.
data/solar_hourly_2025-12.csv — 31 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-01.csv — 31 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-02.csv — 28 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-03.csv — 30 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-04.csv — 30 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-05.csv — 31 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-06.csv — 30 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-07.csv — 31 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-08.csv — 31 daysdata/solar_hourly_2026-09.csv — 30 daysdata/month_notes.md — August monsoon and early-September context